Effects of Conventional Therapy vs. Robotic-Assisted Gait Training on Gait Parameters and Functional Outcomes in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author : Naresh Rangarajan, Dr. Dovile Kiele

Abstract : requiring effective rehabilitation strategies. Conventional therapy remains the standard approach, while robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) offers task-specific, repetitive training to enhance recovery. Objective: To compare the effects of conventional therapy and RAGT on gait parameters and functional outcomes in stroke patients. Methodology: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials involving acute and subacute stroke patients was conducted. Outcomes included gait parameters (gait speed, cadence, step length, stride length) and functional measures (6-Minute Walk Test, 10-Meter Walk Test, Functional Ambulation Category). Pooled effect sizes and confidence intervals were analyzed. Results: Conventional therapy improved gait speed and cadence but had limited effects on step and stride length. RAGT showed greater improvements in gait velocity (SMD = 0.62), stride length, and cadence. No significant differences were found for 6-Minute Walk Test (SMD = 0.18) and 10-Meter Walk Test (SMD = 0.22). However, RAGT significantly improved functional ambulation (FAC: SMD = 0.56, p = 0.003)Conclusion: Both interventions are beneficial, but RAGT provides additional value in improving walking independence. Integrating RAGT into rehabilitation may enhance functional recovery in stroke patients

Keywords : Both interventions are beneficial, but RAGT provides additional value in improving walking independence. Integrating RAGT into rehabilitation may enhance functional recovery in stroke patients

Conference Name : International Conference on Physiotherapy and Chronic Pain Management (ICP-CPM-26)

Conference Place : Pondicherry, India

Conference Date : 18th Apr 2026